Court left to decide on whether animal dangerous after it caused brain injury
Digby Brown's serious injury solicitors were instructed by the wife and daughter of a man who sustained a traumatic brain injury in an accident when a Simmental heifer escaped from a slaughterhouse, ran approximately 100 yards onto a busy town centre High Street and into the pend of a butcher’s shop.
The man and the butcher tried to contain the animal by closing the door of the pend, but the heifer charged, striking him on the chest and pushed him back. He fell back and struck his head on the ground.
The case was very complex. It involved consideration of the Animals (Scotland) Act 1987, as well as a common law case against the slaughterhouse which allowed the animal to escape.
Both parties obtained opinions from veterinary experts on whether the heifer was a “member of a species whose members generally, are by virtue of their physical attributes or habits, likely to injure severely or kill persons or animals”.
Our serious injury solicitors had to consider whether the term “species” should be interpreted as “breed” in light of the interpretation given by the Inner House of the Court of Session in a previous case brought under the Animals (Scotland) Act 1987.
Both veterinary experts gave similar opinions regarding the physical attributes and habits of Simmental heifers.
The difficulty our serious injury solicitors faced was that there is no case law or direction on whether the court can only consider the physical attributes or habits of the animal when in their natural environment; or if the court should also consider the attributes and habits of the animal when it is placed in a terrifying, unfamiliar environment.
Despite the significant risk that the court would find that there was no liability in terms of the Animals (Scotland) Act 1987 or, if the court did find the defenders liable, the man would be found to have significantly contributed to the accident, our serious injury solicitors were able to secure a substantial settlement for the man which compensates him for his loss of earnings and will also pay for the cost of a privately funded package of care.
What our clients say about us
We put our clients at the centre of everything we do and are committed to providing the very best service. The hundreds of five star reviews we have received on Trustpilot is a reflection of this approach.
Car accident, where I was non liable but suffered ...Michael -
Tanya Kaur was my solicitor that dealt with my cla...James Hughes -
Laura Wilson was the solicitor for me in regards t...Iain -
First class service from Sarah in the Inverness of...R M -
After my car accident in March I contacted Digby B...Mrs Stewart -
Following injuries sustained in a car accident, I ...AP -
Dealt with David Henderson who was superb. He was ...Stuart Walton -
I had my two front teeth broken by ceral product a...Michael Oconnell -
I suffered both physical and mental trauma when I ...Kathryn Collyer -
Following a slightly ‘tricky’ redundancy I decided...Susan Todd -
many thanks for your help and the swift outcome, i...Ricky -
My experience from start to finish was brilliant ....Kerry dickson -
0333 200 5926
Monday to Friday: 8am - 7pm
Saturday and Sunday: 12pm - 4pm
(Please note, local rate, even from mobile)
Email enquiry form
Complete our enquiry form and we will strive to reply within 24 hours