Common mistakes in Gall bladder surgery, Compensation | Digby Brown Solicitors
03332005926
(local rate, even from a mobile)

Issues affecting the Gall bladder after surgery

Gall bladder removal (cholecystectomy) is a common surgical procedure in Scottish hospitals.

The vast majority of gall bladders are removed laparascopically otherwise known as keyhole surgery. The laparoscopic method does not require a large incision.

Usually this is an outpatient procedure, which allows the patient to return home the day of surgery, and has a two or three day recovery period.

What's involved in gall bladder surgery?

In removing the gall bladder, the surgeon clips the cystic duct in two places. One is near the cystic duct’s juncture with the gallbladder, and the second is at the cystic duct’s juncture with the common bile duct. The surgeon similarly clips the cystic artery.

The surgeon then transects (cuts) the cystic duct and artery between the two clips. By transecting the cystic duct and artery, the surgeon frees the gall bladder for removal.

The surgeon must find and identify the cystic duct’s juncture with the gall bladder and the cystic duct’s juncture with the common bile duct before transecting the cystic duct. The surgeon accomplishes this by finding the gall bladder and the cystic duct juncture; and then meticulously tracing the cystic duct to its junction with the common bile duct.

The objective is to identify the cystic duct conclusively. The surgeon must not clip the cystic duct or transect it before making conclusive identification of the cystic duct.

Common mistakes in gall bladder surgery

Unfortunately, laparoscopic cholecystectomies do not always go as planned.

The most common mistake is that the surgeon clips or cuts the patient’s common bile duct instead of the cystic duct (known as iatrogenic injury). This injury usually requires extensive, complicated and painful surgery to reconstruct the patient’s biliary anatomy.

Once the patient’s biliary anatomy has been reconstructed, there will be a long period of convalescence. Even then the reconstructive surgery does not always mean that the patient is out of the woods.

After reconstructive surgery, the patient is at risk of scarring and stricturing of the reconstructed biliary tract and further reconstructive surgery. In the worst case scenario, the patient can develop liver failure and die

The basic rule is that the surgeon must conclusively identify the cystic duct before clipping or transecting. If the surgeon makes the conclusive identification, the gall bladder injury will not occur.

Often the litigation in which we are involved focuses on that one issue - that the surgeon failed to conclusively identify the cystic duct. As a result, the surgeon may have placed clips across the common bile duct, obstructing the flow of bile or transected the patient’s common bile duct, resulting in the flow of bile into the patient’s abdomen with consequent sepsis.

Unfortunately we also encounter cases where there is a delay in recognising that injury, resulting in a severely weakened patient and a more complicated and protracted recovery.

Contact our specialist medical negligence solicitors

If you would like to talk to a specialist medical negligence solicitor about your experience with gall bladder surgery, in the first instance please complete a simple Clinical Negligence form.

Please give as much detail as you can as this will assist in our ability to fully understand your circumstances and offer legal advice.

This advice is, of course, free of charge.



based on 1439 reviews
previous
  • First class service.
    Jimmy Ritchie - 11 Mar 2019
  • Excellent, professional and trustworthy reliable service. Constantly kept us up to date with proceedings,...
    ICEPOL - 08 Mar 2019
  • My case for compensation, after being knocked down by a car on a pavement, has been very successfully...
    Lorna - 08 Mar 2019
  • I used Digby Brown after I had an accident at work and am delighted with the way the case was handled...
    evelyn - 06 Mar 2019
  • I have used Digby brown twice now and i cannot fault them,I totally recommend them 100%.
    Melissa Holbrook - 04 Mar 2019
  • Cannot fault the service - would highly recommend.
    Joan - 03 Mar 2019
  • I was unsure at first whether to make a personal injury claim after having laser treatment which went...
    Emma - 28 Feb 2019
  • Digby Brown’s service was brilliant right from the beginning, always keeping me updated by sending...
    Rebecca - 28 Feb 2019
  • Outstanding service from start to finish and I come away with much more than expected thanks to the...
    Stephanie - 28 Feb 2019
  • Only took 1 phone call and they had sorted everything out for me well recommended and always kept me...
    Alan - 28 Feb 2019
  • I contacted Digby Brown due to an accident at a holiday park that was clearly due to negligence on their...
    Hazel - 28 Feb 2019
  • I used Digby Brown and found the expierance stress free.I was kept well informed at all stages for my...
    michael keenan - 27 Feb 2019
  • Professional but friendly. Helpful and insightful. Kept us up to date with what was happening. I\'d be...
    Elaine McCann - 27 Feb 2019
  • Louise was fantastic, extremely helpful, friendly and professional! Thank you!
    Karen - 27 Feb 2019
  • Did a great job
    Catherine - 27 Feb 2019
  • I had a accident last year and called Digby Brown Solicitors. They were Professional, Reliable, and very...
    Lesley - 27 Feb 2019
  • I was worried the experience would be daunting but the solicitor Chris Stewart and Alison Shaw we’re...
    Mrs Gray - 27 Feb 2019
  • Very helpful and knowledgeable staff from start to conclusion. Totally thorough and professional service.
    Mrs Rose Hewit - 27 Feb 2019
  • Excellent service from digby brown, Gail handled the claim professionally and I was always kept up to...
    Laura - 15 Feb 2019
  • I would highly recommend Digby Brown especially Lynne Kerr who dealt with my case always keeping me informed...
    Helen Johnston - 14 Feb 2019
next